Posts by Brian Shiffrin Esq.

Another Exoneration After a False Confession In Monroe County

Posted by on 2:31 am in Blog | 0 comments

On Wednesday, April 28, 2010, two months after Freddie Peacock’s 1976 rape conviction was vacated in Monroe County because DNA evidence established Peacock’s innocence, the 1992 Monroe County murder conviction of Frank Sterling was vacated and the charge dismissed when DNA evidence and the confession of the real killer proved Mr. Sterling’s innocence. (For a detailed account of the Frank Sterling case see this article and this article) The court vacated Mr. Sterling’s conviction...

read more

Second Circuit Tries to Reconcile Strickland and Baldi Standards

Posted by on 11:05 pm in Blog | 0 comments

On April 12, 2010, by a 2-1 vote the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Court in Rosario v Ercole (__F3d_ [2d Cir 4/12/10]) found that counsel provided ineffective assistance under the Strickland standard, but that the New York’s holding to the contrary was not unreasonable. Both the majority and dissent discuss issues regarding the application of the New York and federal standards for ineffectiveness of counsel. The majority held that despite the...

read more

Court of Appeals Apparently Recognizes Inferential Objections

Posted by on 11:38 pm in Blog | 0 comments

In the past the Court of Appeals has held “a party’s failure to specify the basis for a general objection renders the argument unpreserved for [that] Court’s review (see, People v Dien, 77 NY2d 885, 886; People v Tevaha, 84 NY2d 879; People v Ford, 69 NY2d 775, 776).” People v Tonge, 93 N.2d 838, 839 (1999). So one might think that where counsel failed to place any objection on the record the issue...

read more

New York and the Second Circuit Courts of Appeal Differ On The Test For Determining Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

Posted by on 3:12 am in Blog | 0 comments

What is the standard for determining whether appellate counsel provided effective assistance? In 2009, the New York Court of Appeals in People v Borrell (2009 NY Slip Op 03589, 12 NY3d 365[2009] held that the test if not whether appellate counsel failed to raise a potentially winning and potentially dispositive issue, but whether the failure of appellate counsel to raise such an issue deprived defendant of the advocacy to which he was constitutionally entitled....

read more

Timing Is (Nearly) Everything – If You Want A Missing Witness Charge

Posted by on 2:47 am in Blog | 0 comments

A reminder: In 1986 the Court of Appeals held that a party seeking a missing witness instruction has the burden of making the request “as soon as practicable” (People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 428 [1986]). So , if an attorney doesn’t not make a reuesst for such a chargeas early as practicable a coourt may proeprly deny the request,e ven if the requirements of the charge are otherwise met. In People v Carr...

read more