In addition to maintaining this blog on its website, ETKS has long-maintained a separate blog entitled “New York Criminal Defense,” accessible at http://newyorkcriminaldefense.blogspot.com/.
Fourth Department, Sua Sponte, Corrects Illegal Sentence
Court have repeatedly held that where there “was no evidence of intended use of the weapon against another apart from its use in the killing of the murder victim” (People v Boyer, 31 AD3d 1136, 1139, lv denied 7 NY3d 865, amended on other grounds 87 AD3d 1413; see People v Wright, ___ NY3d ___, ___ [June 5, 2012]) the sentence imposed for criminal possession of a weapon must run concurrently with that for the murder. However, in...
read moreThe War on Education
Wait, what? Another war on [your politically popular cause here]? I can’t keep track of them all. This one, however, is unintentional. We backed into it by accident, La Brea Tar Pit style, while our sensibilities were addled by that Demon Weed. And not just pot, all manner of “harder” drugs too. Turns out you don’t actually have to ingest the stuff for it to alter the capacity for rational thought. You see, wars...
read moreRelief Granted On Issue Only Raised In Pro Se Supplemental Brief
As I wrote a few years ago, the most difficult and important part of an appellate attorney’s job is identifying possible issues. An appellate record is like a puzzle that the attorney must solve to discover what issues are present and worth raising. An issue not raised is not likely to result in reversal. That should be enough incentive to scour the record for possibly meritorious issues. If not, the possibility that the court...
read moreProsecutorial Misconduct: Naming Names
Appellate courts confronted with prosecutorial misconduct struggle to find a means to effectively communicate their disapproval of the misconduct without reversing the conviction. Consequently, appellate judges sometimes admonish the appellate prosecutor during oral argument and then issue a decision affirming the conviction upon a finding that the misconduct was harmless error. Of course, the discomfort experienced by the appellate counsel is unlikely to produce a change of behavior in the trial prosecutor who obtained the conviction which was affirmed. Indeed, more than a quarter of a century ago one commentator wrote that Perhaps the most significant reason for the continued...
read moreTrial Tip: Dealing With Inferential Hearsay or Bolstering
byJill Paperno, Special Assistant Monroe County Public DefenderOften the DA will try to introduce hearsay testimony as well as what is considered inferential hearsay and bolstering testimony at trial. They may ask an officer, “Did you talk to the witness Mr. So and So” and then ask the officer, “And after talking to that witness, did you arrest the defendant.” The testimony is trying to get the jury to infer that based on the...
read more
