New Post 4
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent iaculis metus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent iaculis metus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent iaculis metus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent iaculis...
read moreNew Post 3
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent iaculis metus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent iaculis metus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent iaculis metus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent iaculis metus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent iaculis...
read moreNew Post 2
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent iaculis metus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent iaculis metus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent iaculis metus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent iaculis...
read moreNew Post
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent iaculis metus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent iaculis metus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent iaculis metus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent iaculis...
read moreTwo CPW Decisions From the Court of Appeals
The Court of Appeals decided two CPW cases today. In People v Jones (#185 decided 11/19/13), defendant was charged with CPW2 for possessing a weapon in his home, having been previously convicted of a crime. He claimed that, despite his prior conviction, he could rely on PL 265.03(3)’s exception for home or business. The Court of Appeals agreed with the Appellate Division decision below that PL265.03(3) creates an exception to the home or business...
read more
